Friday, May 14, 2010

Can you spend jail time from a CIVIL case?

Or is jail only for criminal cases?Can you spend jail time from a CIVIL case?
Only criminal cases. But if someone lies or obstructs justice in a civil case, it's possible to face criminal charges or jail. And there's always contempt of court.Can you spend jail time from a CIVIL case?
There are any number of ways to be legally held in jail without being convicted of a crime. A suspect may be held in pretrial detention, or someone may violate bail or probation.





In civil case the two common ways are a contempt of court or a dispute involving money. Additionally one may also be an uncooperating material witness. The actual mechanism by which civil arrest is accomplished is the Writ of Capias.
Possibly. Civil cases are disputes about money. However, in a civil case, a judge could cite someone for contempt. Jail time can be imposed on the contempt citation.
no, it's only crimes of a criminal nature that result in a criminal jail sentence
No. There is no jail, probation, etc... from a civil case.
you take an oath dont lie dont get held in contempt of court abide by the rules

NEED TO KNOW! What are some civil liberties cases?

i need some cases on civil liberties and tht would affect high school students or any1 around tht age!NEED TO KNOW! What are some civil liberties cases?
Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 U.S. 503 (1969).





Three high schools students wore black arm bands to school to protest the Vietnam War. They were suspended for violating school dress code. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the students were denied their First Amendment freedom of expression.





Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988).





The Principal of Hazelwood East High School, in St. Louis County, Mo. stripped out of the student-run school newspaper an article about teenage pregnancy (because he thought that the article would have effectively revealed the identities of girls who were pregnant, violating their privacy). The students filed suit and argued that the Principal had violated their First Amendment right -- freedom of the press. But the U.S. Supreme Court disagreed. The USSC held that the newspaper is a school project to be used as an educational tool and it's content can be reasonably regulated by school officials.





But the most famous one is West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, (1943).





Mormon children were expelled from school for refusing to recite the Pledge of Allegiance. The Court concluded that punishment of a person for refusing to engage in an activity which is violative of their own religious beliefs (Mormons believe that they do not ';pledge allegiance to'; anything but God) is a violation of the free exercise of religion.NEED TO KNOW! What are some civil liberties cases?
You need to google the teenage boy who wore an anti-war teeshirt to school and was expelled.





Or look at the anti-war protesters in NYC during the Republican convention. They were arrested, detained in a contaminated bus depot for weeks. Nobody knew where they were.





The judges were furious when they learned that the police had detained them illegally -- violating their right to freedom to assemble and freedom of speech.





Do research. It's the best way to get homework done.
Try the website for the American Civil Liberties Union: www.aclu.org. Lots of info there, and cool music, too, at the standup/youth link.
There are several --- google black arm bands, a vietnam era case or Jehova Witnesses and the pledge of allegiance. Get creative and think for yourself and stop spending your time on this stupid web site hoping to learn something without putting forth some effort.

I have proof that civil rights discrimmination cases are illegally dismissed by the fed. govt. What can I do?

My Title VII case was against a federal government agency. The treatment I received by filing a discrimmination case was the worst dealing with terrorism I have ever encountered. I have proof that would put the federal government to shame. How can I request an investigation into this matter?I have proof that civil rights discrimmination cases are illegally dismissed by the fed. govt. What can I do?
The press is always goodI have proof that civil rights discrimmination cases are illegally dismissed by the fed. govt. What can I do?
Contact the ACLU. http://www.aclu.com


They specialize in just these kinds of cases.


Contact info at http://www.aclu.com/contact/index.html

Civil Cases (Small claims)?

The maximum allowed in my city for small claims is $3000. If I ask for this entire amount can the judge reduce it or is it either judgment for the entire amount or nothing? thanks in advance.Civil Cases (Small claims)?
The judge can reduce it. He can award you all, part or none of what you ask for.

Civil cases again???

ohk australian civil case articles im looking for guys i need articles from 2008 about parties suing other parties thanks websites would be good


ive done a web search a million times and get nothingCivil cases again???
Try AustLII.edu.au





It's one of the most extensive Australian legal information databases, containing legislation, case law and journals.





If you are looking for civil cases, refer to the menu on the left under Cases and Legislation, selecting the relevant state. Find the 2008 decisions, and you should be on the money.





If you are looking for actual articles on civil cases, refer to Libaries menu. This contains law review journals, etc.
  • beauty secrets
  • Can I recoup solicitor's fees in civil case if case dropped?

    If you pay solicitors fees due to being taken to a civil court over disputed payment in a business transaction, can you recoup the fees if the complainant / plaintiff drops the case or fails to turn up?Can I recoup solicitor's fees in civil case if case dropped?
    even if the matter was dropped you will still have to pay your own solicitors costsCan I recoup solicitor's fees in civil case if case dropped?
    If you are the Defendant and the Plaintiff simply abandons (';withdraws';) the action without any agreement between you as to costs you are entitled to your costs.If it was literally a matter of the other side dropping the case apply for an Order for Costs.You should get it without any further argument.

    In the federal system the courts that hear a majority of the civil and criminal cases are ___ courts?

    10 letters


    8th letter: I





    |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|I|_|_In the federal system the courts that hear a majority of the civil and criminal cases are ___ courts?
    |If you're talking the US, the federal court system (other than appellate) is United States District Court. They hear civil and criminal cases.





    http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/le鈥?/a>

    What are the steps in a Texas Civil Case?

    What are the steps involved in a Texas Civil Case?What are the steps in a Texas Civil Case?
    Texas





    (1) Petition - by plaintiff


    (2) Issuance of citation - by the clerk


    (3) Service of citation - by any Sheriff, Constable or other person certified by law, ie, process server. personal delivery, registered or certified mail return receipt requested


    (4) Defendant - must file a written answer to plaintiff's petition


    (5) Court date set by judge


    (6) Judgment

    How and when does one file for a Subpoena in a civil case?

    One needn't file for one at all. In most courts, the clerk issues them in blank. The litigant fills it in and serves it on the witness.How and when does one file for a Subpoena in a civil case?
    A Subpoena is, usually, a demand that a witness appear in court to give testimony. Subpoenas are not usually generated unless the proposed witness has shown a reluctance or refusal to provide testimony in a case. The Subpoena is prepared by a lawyer who wishes to question the witness, or ordered by a judge who feels that the testimony of that witness would be valuable in his/her decision.





    A lawyer can also subpoena the production of witnesses, documents, and other tangible evidence prior to the court hearing, during the ';discovery'; phase of case preparation.





    There are many kinds of subpoenas. The purpose of the subpoena determines which kind is prepared in any given situation.How and when does one file for a Subpoena in a civil case?
    A person responding to a subpoena need not produce the sama electronically stored information more than one form

    Civil cases won by defendants less than 10,000.00?

    I am looking for information on inproper civil cases won by defendants. How to do amendments to the complaints, or any assistance in trial brief, interrogatoriesCivil cases won by defendants less than 10,000.00?
    You are asking a lot.





    It appears you may be trying to represent yourself. This is decidedly unwise. The attorney for the plaintiff knows the procedures for amending a complaint, for preparing a trial brief, and the process of discovery. (Interrogatories are just one discovery tool). Unless you have had the legal training, you should not be doing this yourself.





    Many people get sued, and then decide that they can't afford to hire a lawyer to defend them. In many cases, they decide this because they decide that they don't have a case, and that there is no reason to pay more money to someone else. This means they are giving themself bad advice.





    It seems to me that it would be wise for you to make an appointment with a lawyer for a consultation. Let the lawyer evaluate your case and determine if there is merit to your defense. Then, you can negotiate with them on the cost of defending it, or if there are other options rather than taking it to trial.





    Without training and experience, if you take the matter to trial yourself, the outcome is unlikely to be in your favor.

    Should the FBI be reopening old civil rights unsolved cases and?

    Do you think they will include the case of Ted K and Mary Jo at chappaquiddick?Should the FBI be reopening old civil rights unsolved cases and?
    They must need some overtime. Granted, a crime is a crime but attudes have changed greatly since the 50s and 60s. Even Gov. George Wallace had a change of heart and apoligized for the prejudical mistakes he made earlier in his career.





    We have to ask ourselves, would society be better off spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to investigate and try someone who is now probably elderly and no threat to society? This sounds like one area where we should let sleeping dogs lie.





    I'm sure that the families of the victims would prefer to prosecute but even they must agree that the money would be better spent upgrading border defenses, Homeland Security, etc.





    Now Ted and Mary Jo........Let's see.......how much would that case cost taxpayers? Ted would probably only get probation anyway.Should the FBI be reopening old civil rights unsolved cases and?
    Of course it won't include the Kennedy's. That case has already been solved, but ole Teddy was not brought to justice.
    I think they absolutely should be reopening these cold cases if they feel they have a chance to arrest, charge, and convict those responsible.





    From my understanding, there are only a few cases they will be reopening right now, due to the available evidence in the cases.





    The Ted Kennedy ';incident'; isn't considered a civil rights case.
    Only if it meens releasing any innocent people who were wrongfully charged.
  • beauty secrets
  • Do all civil court cases have to have a jury?

    No, you can request the judge hear the case w/o a jury.Do all civil court cases have to have a jury?
    NoDo all civil court cases have to have a jury?
    No. In most cases, you have the right to a trial by jury (but not all), but you can choose to have the case seen by a judge rather than a jury.
    No, but if either party requests one they have to have a jury....plus depends on which court - in small claims court there is no jury.
    No. Some are bench trials by statute. Depends on the state and the law. For example, dependency cases in Florida are tried in civil court (dependency) and are bench trials.

    Can a State Body be the plantiff in a civil case?

    Can a municipality bring charges against a civiliian for a public offense in a civil court?Can a State Body be the plantiff in a civil case?
    It happens all the time. The town is like a corporate entity in many ways, including the right to sue or be sued in court. My town recently sued a taxpayer, in superior court of the county, for violation of the zoning code because we have no administrative procedures to handle it in town. In another scenario the town could sue a person in civil court for damaging or stealing town property.





    Another common ';state body'; is a public school or other institution, which may enforce its own rights in civil suits. For example, a state university may have valuable trademarks or other property rights that can be protected by suing an infringer in federal court. (think ';GATORade';)





    If ';public offense'; is intended to mean ';criminal violation';, then the question of civil suit in addition to criminal charges would depend upon whether the law also provides a civil remedy for that crime. If the violation were one of the ';victimless crimes';, then it may be difficult to measure damages, even if there were a civil cause of action.Can a State Body be the plantiff in a civil case?
    Of course. Happens all the time....





    Take child support cases for example...They are civil suits brought against ';civilians'; in civil courts....
    Why, yes. Of course.

    Can anybody ban me from entering US for a civil case?

    If I lose a civil case and can not pay the judgement amount, and then leave USA, In the future, can somebody ban me from re-entering US with a unsatisfied judgement or debt?Can anybody ban me from entering US for a civil case?
    Be warned, I am not a lawyer but here goes,





    1. Dodging payments of 'judgement amounts' from a civil case (whether by fleeing the country or otherwise) won't DIRECTLY be grounds for barring entry into the USA.





    2. HOWEVER, Refusing to pay would lead to a 'Contempt of Court' charge or something to that effect. You would be graduating from a civil matter to something MUCH more serious.





    3. With a warrant out for your arrest for contempt, you will probably be VERY WELCOME to reenter the USA to be incarcerated.





    4. If you are not a citizen, I.N.S. can bar you from entering the country for an UNPAID SPEEDING TICKET, or just about anything they can come up with. If it suits them to bar you because of your handling of the CIVIL CASE they certainly WOULD do that.Can anybody ban me from entering US for a civil case?
    No, they will not ban you from re-entering. In fact, they will encourage you to re-enter so they can arrest you and put you into custody until you satisfy your obligations.
    NO


    Your credit will suck though. And that is universal.

    If a civil case uses a long-arm statute, does the complaint have to mention it?

    Or can a long-arm statute be used implicitly, without even any mention of jurisdiction in the complaint?If a civil case uses a long-arm statute, does the complaint have to mention it?
    You will have to justify bringing the action in a particular jurisdiction. If you live in County A and the defendant lives in county B you have to state that the contract or action took place in county A.


    The courts have ruled that almost any contact between a defendant and your jurisdiction makes him accountable in that venue.


    Even sending an email to you is enough.


    If different States are involved you will have to serve the secretary of State, in your state who will, in turn, serve the Secretary of State in his State and they will serve the defendant.


    I recently brought suit, in the District Court in Michigan, against a Company in California. I was able to serve the complaint by registered mail and bring the proof of service to the District court.


    The service was valid and the defendant had to get ( and pay) a Michigan attorney to defend him in Michigan.


    I had a solid case so they settled before trial.If a civil case uses a long-arm statute, does the complaint have to mention it?
    You're right! I did seem to contradict myself.


    What I should have said is that in Small claims or district court you can serve by mail.


    In higher courts such as Circuit courts you have to go through the secretary of State, at least in my State.

    Report Abuse



    the complaint should mention it.
    ANY case that goes to a court should mention why that court was chosen: namely, it has jurisdiction in the mattter.

    Explain the main differences between civil and criminal cases?

    homework please help meExplain the main differences between civil and criminal cases?
    criminal is a crime against society





    civil is a case where someone is wrongedExplain the main differences between civil and criminal cases?
    In a criminal case, you can go to jail (be deprived of liberty). In a civil case you just pay money if you lose.





    In a criminal case, the evidence must be ';beyond a reasonable doubt';. In a civil case, just ';preponderance of evidence'; - whichever side has more, even if slightly more in their favor.





    In a civil case, it is ';plaintiff'; vs ';defendant';, the wronged party against the wrong doer. Often there is no criminal statute violated. Just the claim of the plaintiff that something is wrong.





    In a civil case, it is the state vs the defendant. And there are criminal law statutes that are used for the prosecution.
    Criminal cases are when the government in prosecuting a person.


    (Society vs. Person)





    While Civil is when a person/organization is prosecuting another person/organization


    (Person vs. Person)
    civil: person vs. person


    burden of proof on the plaintiff: beyond reasonable doubt





    criminal: society accusing person.


    burden of proof: more likely than not



    Do your own homework LOL

    Current court civil cases?

    can anyone tell me at least one current civil case? and tell me a brief description of itCurrent court civil cases?
    Go nuts, pick one from the list below from the U.S District Court -- District of New Hampshire, Filed Report Period: 3/1/2009 - 3/31/2009


    at http://www.nhd.uscourts.gov/cp/new-civil鈥?/a>





    You can find more specific cases if you search for ';civil court + state) at any internet search site.
  • beauty secrets
  • Is there any time limit for filing civil case after incidence?

    Is there any time limit for filing a case after perticular incidence in civil court in India/SriLanka ?Is there any time limit for filing civil case after incidence?
    As per law of limitation in India a civil suit could be filed within the period of three years from the date when cause of action arose and where notice is obligatory, then that period shall be additional period.Is there any time limit for filing civil case after incidence?
    Yes there is a time limit to file Civil case as well some of the Criminal cases too in India. The Limitation Act,1963 provided for the filling of Civil cases in Indian Courts where as section 468 of the Criminal Procedure Code,1973 provides Bar to the court of taking cognizance of criminal complaints after lapse of the period of limitation in certain cases.
    You shuold file it as soon as possible after the incident. it is for your own safeside. after taking long time you should be in the trouble.

    Is it legal to bribe someone to testify in a civil case?

    This company my sister in law and my self used to work for asked me to testify against my sister in law in a civil case she has against them. They said ';we will compensate you if you testify against her in court. '; Is this legal?Is it legal to bribe someone to testify in a civil case?
    Well, yes, it is just a paid witness. Although the other attorney will question you as to whether you were ';paid'; to be there, and that can ruin your credibility, as well as the fact that you are her sister, unless you believe you should go with the company instead of her, you might want to keep yourself out of it unless subpeona'd to testify.Is it legal to bribe someone to testify in a civil case?
    YES
    Nah! They are just saying that they will pay your expenses, airfare, lost wages or whatever it costs you to attend. If you were an expert witness, they could pay you also. If they subpoena you, they will have to pay your expenses. But if they are offering to bribe you, that is illegal and I'll bet they never try.
    depends on what they mean by 'compinsate' they are either allowed, or required to repay any expenses you incur as a result of you making yourself available to testify. (rooms, airfare, transportation) or any wages you might lose during the time that you are required to be available to the court. anything other than that is bribery or witness tampering and probably a couple of other felonies that I can't remember the names for right now.
    If they are paying you to appear and tell the truth, then it's legal, but the fact that you are being paid might be considered to be germane to your testimony. (Meaning that the jury can consider the fact that you were paid to be there when they weigh your testimony, should that fact that you are being paid to appear be disclosed in court.)





    If they are paying you to give false testimony, then they are guilty of obstruction of justice even if you refuse their offer. (And you would be guilty of conspiracy if you accepted, and also guilty of perjury if you went through with it and testified falsely.) Although, in a civil case, it's possible that a summary judgment would be issued against them for doing so rather than referring charges for criminal prosecution.
    If they offered to pay you for giving evidence, this constitutes the very serious crime of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. Of course you must report the matter. Make sure you have evidence, though, in case they claim that you asked them for compensation. These people sound nasty.


    Make sure too that they weren't simply saying that they would pay your expenses. This would be permitted by law.
    Unless you are being asked to commit PERJURY and lie under oath, it is not illegal to compensate you for testifying. Doctors are paid to testify in civil court cases every day. If however you are ASKED by the other attorney if you're being compensated for testifying, you have to admit that you are or else you are committing perjury and could go to jail for it.
    It's not a bribe unless they offer to pay you to testify falsely.





    Witnesses in civil trials are frequently compensated for their time and travel expenses.





    You don't have any choice, by the way, in whether you will testify or not. If you refuse to testify voluntarily, they can subpoena you, and you must attend. If you refuse to answer questions you can be charged with contempt of court, and if you lie, you can be charged with perjury.





    Richard
    Uh of course it's illegal. If you are caught you could face charges.
    Ok, take a small voice recorder with you and PLEASE record their offer of bribery. Then you know what to do next. Enough.
    Since you haven't specified what they mean by ';compensate'; (and perhaps you don't know), it is possible that they are somewhat misleading you.





    In many states, if not all, witnesses who are subpoenaed to testify in court are paid a witness and mileage fee to appear. This is legal, as it is required by state law. Where I live, the witness fee is $20.00, and you are paid $0.20 per mile round trip.





    It's possible that this company was simply trying to entice you to testify by saying that they would paid for you to come there, when in reality they are required to do so. Deceptive, perhaps, but not illegal.

    How do I go about looking up matters about a civil case filed in a courthouse?

    Most counties have on on line public record search. Look up __________ county clerk of courts. Then you will just need to search the site and find their public records. From there it will be easy to do case search, name search or whatever. Good luck.How do I go about looking up matters about a civil case filed in a courthouse?
    go to the courthouse. see the clerk, ask for helpHow do I go about looking up matters about a civil case filed in a courthouse?
    Some counties have their civil records on record at the county court web site. Your county may or may not have one. If you call the clerk of court, they can give you the web site address, and tell you what case information is available.
    you will get alot of run around no matter what you do! but try online first since gov. records (most gov records) are public domain other than that the easiest way to find out would be to call and ask a lawyer what would be the easiest way to obtain that info :)

    I have two lawyers for a civil case and each wants to take 20% each and have me pay court fees?

    I do not want to pay court fees, is this normal?I have two lawyers for a civil case and each wants to take 20% each and have me pay court fees?
    The court fees? Yes, that's normal. Its your case, so why should the attorneys pay it? That'd be like your boss paying the gas for you to get to work in the morning.





    As far as each taking 20%, that's a bit high. Normal contingency cases go at about 1/3 through trial, and a bit more if it has to be appealed.





    Why do you have 2 attorneys? Did one recommend getting the other? If that's the case, they should be splitting the 20% - not each getting a separate 20%.I have two lawyers for a civil case and each wants to take 20% each and have me pay court fees?
    I would also check with the local bar association and see if it is ethical for 40% of your settlement and court fees should come out of your cut.
    Why not shop for other lawyers.
    I hope you win, and if so, try to have the other party pay them

    Need to know Georgia's state law on statue of limitations civil cases?

    Each different type of civil action has a different statute of limitations-- for example, contract actions might be 5 years, tort actions (like personal injury or defamation) might be 2 years [edit: it appears that they may be 2 years in Georgia. See O.C.G.A. 搂 9-3-33; but there may be lots of cases or other rules that affect that date] ; property actions might be 10 years. And then some statutes may have their own, unique limitations periods on top of that.


    Sometimes statutes of limitations are ';tolled'; (which means that the period doesn't run) for one reason or another -- like the plaintiff is under 18, or you could have ';discovered'; the injury yet, or for other public policy reasons. There are also ';statutes of repose,'; which means there's an outer limit of time from the time the harm actually occurred that you must bring the action -- these are rarely, if ever, tolled, so that adds another level of complexity.





    It appears that the Georgia limitations periods are in Title 9, Chapter 3, section 1 and following.


    http://w3.lexis-nexis.com/hottopics/gaco鈥?/a>


    If you have a particular question about statutes of limitations in Georgia, you should see an attorney (quickly if you believe that a limitations period is running out) licensed in Georgia. Contact your local bar association for a referral.Need to know Georgia's state law on statue of limitations civil cases?
    On injury cases typically up to 6 years. I wouldn't wait too long. Memories get short with time.

    Difference between civil case and child / spousal support?

    What is the difference between civil cases and child / spousal support? How come with child / spousal support, it is easier to obtain the money with the family maintenance enforcement program or the government will help you, but when you sue someone, they can pretty much skip town and it's a lot more difficult to get your money?Difference between civil case and child / spousal support?
    A civil case is a lawsuit, such as you stealing money from someone, your kid got bit by a dog, you slipped on a floor in a store due to neglegance..etc.








    A spousal support hearing is to see how much money based on your income you owe to the other party (ex wife/husband/bf/gf) so your child can get its basic necessities and other things too.Difference between civil case and child / spousal support?
    Because with child support and spousal support the government is on the hook if you collect for the child or yourself through the system. That is one fundamental reason. There are others of a policy nature.
    Because when you sue someone the State is not making money from it. They make billions in child support cases.
  • beauty secrets
  • Please help, do human rights have any relevance if I do not have the fiances to go to court with a civil case?

    I have been fighting for the past year with the Gardi in the rep of Ireland to bring charges against a man who 'allegetly' raped me and claimed it was consental. I was drugged and unconsious but the Gardi are making a mockery of my complaint. They treated me very badly and done everything in they're power to discourage me from pursuing the case. They have acted unprofessionally and very insensitive towards my distress. Both the purortaitor and I are from the North of Ireland and he know every thing about me and the Gardi still refuse to tell me who this man is. They pass me from pillar to post with excuses and behave completely ignorant to me when I enquire about the developments. They are still claiming the forensics are not ready over a year later! It is totally corrupt and I feel so angery that they continue to get away with this. Although the Ombudsman are investigating they still show no signs of concern I think the offender may have exchanged money to keep hush?Please help, do human rights have any relevance if I do not have the fiances to go to court with a civil case?
    There is no reason why they should display concern - their interest is only in the legal elements of the case. Maybe they don't feel they have a case against the man. If you have forensic evidence and it is not a case of your word against his then I think you have to talk to your solicitor and ask his advice about how you take this further. Good luck.Please help, do human rights have any relevance if I do not have the fiances to go to court with a civil case?
    I do not know your legal rights, but please keep fighting. Have you contacted Fair Trials Abroad? They are a wonderful organisation who may be able to help you. I wish you all the best in your fight, keep strong and don't give up.
    Article 6 of the HRA states that parties before the court must have ';equality of arms';. Unfortunately this equality does not extend to funding for legal representation. Also, taking a private prosecution on a rape case when the police are still investigating will be a no go from the beginning.





    The best course of action is your MP (or equivallent) and the Republic version of the Independant Police Complaints Commission.





    Good luck, and keep fighting
    Try bringing it to the attention of your MP or MLA and the TD of the area where the incident occurred.





    Try bringing into a more public arena if you are willing. Shows such as Joe Duffy on RT脡 Radio 1 may be of use, or maybe an equivalent show in BBC Radio Ulster.

    How do I start a civil case?

    Two years ago the house beside me caught fire. Because of this my motor home was severely damaged. It was finally determined arson. There has been two arrests made. One person admitted guilt but he was a minor. The other who happens to be a very good friend is awaiting trial. It was suggested that we start a civil case to get the money I feel that is owed to us. We couldn't get any insurance money because it was arson so we took a $5000 loss. Any suggetions?How do I start a civil case?
    Your own insurance should cover arson unless it was a member of your household who did it.





    Assuming nobody from your household caused the fire, you have a claim against the person who did it (who is probably judgment proof however) and you might get an order of restitution as part of the criminal judgment.





    You generally can't sue an insurance company other than your own -- you have to sue the insured person.





    Filing a claim is easy: you go to the county court house and get a form or buy a form from a legal stationer and fill it out and either serve it and then file it, or in some states it's the other way around: file and then serve,





    But you may need help getting the complaint properly worded or you will lose yor case before you start it. The court clerk can't help you, but s/he might be able to show you samples from other cases that you can copy,





    I don't know why idiots tell you to ';hire a lawyer'; when in fact the lawyer would probably cost you more than you can collect as a judgment. On the other hand, if you live in Canada you get your lawyer's fees back as part of your judgment. If you win.





    If you are poor, you might visit a legal clinic such as one at a local law school. They can help with procedural matters and filling out forms.How do I start a civil case?
    Its easy to start a civil case and where I live you can even go to small claims cout. Your problem is, although the guiy may have been arrested, in a civil case You must prove it. If he was conviced it would be a different story.
    You need a lawyer.
    Get a lawyer... One of those that collect nothing unless you win type thing. Often the first consultation is fre anyway and younow if you have a case.





    If you want to do it by yourself, go to the courthouse and file the pertinent motion
    I would speak to a lawyer about getting your neighbors policy to pay for your damages. It may have been arson, but it's not like you hired them to do it. You were the unwitting victim of a crime.





    Did you have any insurance yourself? I would at the very least hire a lawyer to deal with the insurance companies. It just doesn't sound right that neither company would pay.





    Filing suit against the people who did this won't do any good unless they have the money to pay you or will have future earnings that you can attach.





    It sounds like you are getting a raw deal and a lawyer would be the one to tell you how to best go about this. Make an appointment for a consultation and bring a copy of your policy and of the turndown letter from your neighbors insurance company. Go to a sole practitioner since a big firm will cost way too much to handle a matter like this.
    Do you mean yours or their insurance company would not pay? It seems that their insurance company would pay, arson or otherwise. Anyway, you have to see a lawyer. If nothing else, you will know if a lawsuit will be worth it.
    Unless you know the law, get a lawyer. Small claims court is the only place where you can defend yourself ,and present your case with any degree of success.
    First actually no, unless you did the arson, you can get money if your damage was accidental from the reason that the arson happened. So you have a law suit against your insurance company first ( and since they have the money that is where you need to start)





    next you can sue the family of the minor, his parents can be held responsible for his actions. And the suit would be against both of them together. But unless they have 5000 in the bank, what are you going to do, Esp if they go to jail. What will you get from them 10 dollars a week after they get out of jail.





    next there is a statue of limiation to start a law suit, if you wait to long you can't even collect any money
    sue his parents they are responsible for his actions. first off retain a lawyer. also id get on it too, there is a statuate of limitations too.
    Talk to a Lawyer!!!
    Depends upon the insurance, some have to pay even if it IS arson. It wasnt your fault.





    If insurance does not apply, get a lawyer and file a civil suit.


    Even if you win, you may not get any money, but if you dont get a


    judgement, you certainly wont get anything
    The fact that arsonist burned down your neighbors house is not a reason for your insurance company to refuse to pay you for the damage to your rv. That is only a defense for the insurance company when a person deliberately burns down their own property and they trys to collect on their insurance. Make another demand on your insurance company and if they refuse to pay, then report the matter to your state insurance commisioner. Also you could sue the insurance company in small claims court where you would not need to hire an attorney.
    Get a lawyer

    In a civil case which lawyer would you choose?

    I have 3 lawyers to choose from.I feel like what if I make the wrong choice.


    I am meeting with one tommorow is my moms friends lawyer who they said has done very well by them.


    the 2nd is the one recommended from the bar associaition who has been very knowledgable but I dont know them.


    3rd is a lawyer friend, who highly recommends this lawyer and she said that she would work on the case with him.unsure if I want her to know every detail of my life including financials.In a civil case which lawyer would you choose?
    I would choose the one with the most knowledge and experience for the type of case you would have. A lawyer may do very well for your mom's friend in one type of case, but not in your type of case. You should also check to see if any of the attorneys have a Martindale-Hubbell Rating. ';AV'; is the best rating. I understand your privacy concerns with respect to the third lawyer. I would also ask what their fees are, hourly or contingent, and what percentage if contingent fees are involved.





    Good luck,


    Dana (attorney)In a civil case which lawyer would you choose?
    civil suit covers many areas need more facts
    It doesnot really matter if you make the wrong choices in life here in choosing a civil lawyer, but since you are guided accordingly with some of the family members %26amp; some friends I do not think you will make the wrong turn or move in choosing one.





    In my own opinion it might better to talk with all of them, and make your own assessment, just like a doctor's prescription it might better to ask a second opinion on everything don't you think. Well in these case you got three choices, all you need is to choose one which you think is good %26amp; great for your case. If possible why not record every conversation with them buy one tape recorder %26amp; hid them between your coat or somewhere in the room. And after the conversation with each one of them, consult a psychologist well if you happen to have one good friend, and just inquire if who among these guys are telling me the truth. If this is too much for you then choose the best recommend one.
    I would pick number 3, I am a paralegal and have worked with attorneys for over 15 years.





    Attorneys are paid to work for your best interests, and with #3 you can be double sure this is being done, plus that attorney will not want to disappoint her colleague (friend) as most attorneys survive on referrals Plus the added bonus of your friend making sure this lawyer is doing her job and that she has the legal skills to understand if she is or isn't sways this choice for me.





    If not then go with Bar association recommendation, just because an attorney did good work for a family member doesn't mean your case is comparable. Go with professional referrals I think that would be your best bet.
    Bar associations give referrals NOT recommendations. Do not confuse the two. It is always best to go with an attorney that has a good reference. Consult with the two recommended attorneys and during your consultation do not be afraid to ask how much does it look like my damages are worth so that you can make a decision based on how much you will receive after fees. A good attorney is supposed to be able to tell you that. Do not sign with either attorney right away, give it a few days and let each attorney know that you have other consultations scheduled before making a hiring decision.

    Need to know Georgia's state law on statue of limitations civil cases?

    Each different type of civil action has a different statute of limitations-- for example, contract actions might be 5 years, tort actions (like personal injury or defamation) might be 2 years [edit: it appears that they may be 2 years in Georgia. See O.C.G.A. 搂 9-3-33; but there may be lots of cases or other rules that affect that date] ; property actions might be 10 years. And then some statutes may have their own, unique limitations periods on top of that.


    Sometimes statutes of limitations are ';tolled'; (which means that the period doesn't run) for one reason or another -- like the plaintiff is under 18, or you could have ';discovered'; the injury yet, or for other public policy reasons. There are also ';statutes of repose,'; which means there's an outer limit of time from the time the harm actually occurred that you must bring the action -- these are rarely, if ever, tolled, so that adds another level of complexity.





    It appears that the Georgia limitations periods are in Title 9, Chapter 3, section 1 and following.


    http://w3.lexis-nexis.com/hottopics/gaco鈥?/a>


    If you have a particular question about statutes of limitations in Georgia, you should see an attorney (quickly if you believe that a limitations period is running out) licensed in Georgia. Contact your local bar association for a referral.Need to know Georgia's state law on statue of limitations civil cases?
    On injury cases typically up to 6 years. I wouldn't wait too long. Memories get short with time.

    Difference between civil case and child / spousal support?

    What is the difference between civil cases and child / spousal support? How come with child / spousal support, it is easier to obtain the money with the family maintenance enforcement program or the government will help you, but when you sue someone, they can pretty much skip town and it's a lot more difficult to get your money?Difference between civil case and child / spousal support?
    A civil case is a lawsuit, such as you stealing money from someone, your kid got bit by a dog, you slipped on a floor in a store due to neglegance..etc.








    A spousal support hearing is to see how much money based on your income you owe to the other party (ex wife/husband/bf/gf) so your child can get its basic necessities and other things too.Difference between civil case and child / spousal support?
    Because with child support and spousal support the government is on the hook if you collect for the child or yourself through the system. That is one fundamental reason. There are others of a policy nature.
    Because when you sue someone the State is not making money from it. They make billions in child support cases.

    Please help, do human rights have any relevance if I do not have the fiances to go to court with a civil case?

    I have been fighting for the past year with the Gardi in the rep of Ireland to bring charges against a man who 'allegetly' raped me and claimed it was consental. I was drugged and unconsious but the Gardi are making a mockery of my complaint. They treated me very badly and done everything in they're power to discourage me from pursuing the case. They have acted unprofessionally and very insensitive towards my distress. Both the purortaitor and I are from the North of Ireland and he know every thing about me and the Gardi still refuse to tell me who this man is. They pass me from pillar to post with excuses and behave completely ignorant to me when I enquire about the developments. They are still claiming the forensics are not ready over a year later! It is totally corrupt and I feel so angery that they continue to get away with this. Although the Ombudsman are investigating they still show no signs of concern I think the offender may have exchanged money to keep hush?Please help, do human rights have any relevance if I do not have the fiances to go to court with a civil case?
    There is no reason why they should display concern - their interest is only in the legal elements of the case. Maybe they don't feel they have a case against the man. If you have forensic evidence and it is not a case of your word against his then I think you have to talk to your solicitor and ask his advice about how you take this further. Good luck.Please help, do human rights have any relevance if I do not have the fiances to go to court with a civil case?
    I do not know your legal rights, but please keep fighting. Have you contacted Fair Trials Abroad? They are a wonderful organisation who may be able to help you. I wish you all the best in your fight, keep strong and don't give up.
    Article 6 of the HRA states that parties before the court must have ';equality of arms';. Unfortunately this equality does not extend to funding for legal representation. Also, taking a private prosecution on a rape case when the police are still investigating will be a no go from the beginning.





    The best course of action is your MP (or equivallent) and the Republic version of the Independant Police Complaints Commission.





    Good luck, and keep fighting
    Try bringing it to the attention of your MP or MLA and the TD of the area where the incident occurred.





    Try bringing into a more public arena if you are willing. Shows such as Joe Duffy on RT脡 Radio 1 may be of use, or maybe an equivalent show in BBC Radio Ulster.
  • beauty secrets
  • How do I start a civil case?

    Two years ago the house beside me caught fire. Because of this my motor home was severely damaged. It was finally determined arson. There has been two arrests made. One person admitted guilt but he was a minor. The other who happens to be a very good friend is awaiting trial. It was suggested that we start a civil case to get the money I feel that is owed to us. We couldn't get any insurance money because it was arson so we took a $5000 loss. Any suggetions?How do I start a civil case?
    Your own insurance should cover arson unless it was a member of your household who did it.





    Assuming nobody from your household caused the fire, you have a claim against the person who did it (who is probably judgment proof however) and you might get an order of restitution as part of the criminal judgment.





    You generally can't sue an insurance company other than your own -- you have to sue the insured person.





    Filing a claim is easy: you go to the county court house and get a form or buy a form from a legal stationer and fill it out and either serve it and then file it, or in some states it's the other way around: file and then serve,





    But you may need help getting the complaint properly worded or you will lose yor case before you start it. The court clerk can't help you, but s/he might be able to show you samples from other cases that you can copy,





    I don't know why idiots tell you to ';hire a lawyer'; when in fact the lawyer would probably cost you more than you can collect as a judgment. On the other hand, if you live in Canada you get your lawyer's fees back as part of your judgment. If you win.





    If you are poor, you might visit a legal clinic such as one at a local law school. They can help with procedural matters and filling out forms.How do I start a civil case?
    Its easy to start a civil case and where I live you can even go to small claims cout. Your problem is, although the guiy may have been arrested, in a civil case You must prove it. If he was conviced it would be a different story.
    You need a lawyer.
    Get a lawyer... One of those that collect nothing unless you win type thing. Often the first consultation is fre anyway and younow if you have a case.





    If you want to do it by yourself, go to the courthouse and file the pertinent motion
    I would speak to a lawyer about getting your neighbors policy to pay for your damages. It may have been arson, but it's not like you hired them to do it. You were the unwitting victim of a crime.





    Did you have any insurance yourself? I would at the very least hire a lawyer to deal with the insurance companies. It just doesn't sound right that neither company would pay.





    Filing suit against the people who did this won't do any good unless they have the money to pay you or will have future earnings that you can attach.





    It sounds like you are getting a raw deal and a lawyer would be the one to tell you how to best go about this. Make an appointment for a consultation and bring a copy of your policy and of the turndown letter from your neighbors insurance company. Go to a sole practitioner since a big firm will cost way too much to handle a matter like this.
    Do you mean yours or their insurance company would not pay? It seems that their insurance company would pay, arson or otherwise. Anyway, you have to see a lawyer. If nothing else, you will know if a lawsuit will be worth it.
    Unless you know the law, get a lawyer. Small claims court is the only place where you can defend yourself ,and present your case with any degree of success.
    First actually no, unless you did the arson, you can get money if your damage was accidental from the reason that the arson happened. So you have a law suit against your insurance company first ( and since they have the money that is where you need to start)





    next you can sue the family of the minor, his parents can be held responsible for his actions. And the suit would be against both of them together. But unless they have 5000 in the bank, what are you going to do, Esp if they go to jail. What will you get from them 10 dollars a week after they get out of jail.





    next there is a statue of limiation to start a law suit, if you wait to long you can't even collect any money
    sue his parents they are responsible for his actions. first off retain a lawyer. also id get on it too, there is a statuate of limitations too.
    Talk to a Lawyer!!!
    Depends upon the insurance, some have to pay even if it IS arson. It wasnt your fault.





    If insurance does not apply, get a lawyer and file a civil suit.


    Even if you win, you may not get any money, but if you dont get a


    judgement, you certainly wont get anything
    The fact that arsonist burned down your neighbors house is not a reason for your insurance company to refuse to pay you for the damage to your rv. That is only a defense for the insurance company when a person deliberately burns down their own property and they trys to collect on their insurance. Make another demand on your insurance company and if they refuse to pay, then report the matter to your state insurance commisioner. Also you could sue the insurance company in small claims court where you would not need to hire an attorney.
    Get a lawyer

    In a civil case which lawyer would you choose?

    I have 3 lawyers to choose from.I feel like what if I make the wrong choice.


    I am meeting with one tommorow is my moms friends lawyer who they said has done very well by them.


    the 2nd is the one recommended from the bar associaition who has been very knowledgable but I dont know them.


    3rd is a lawyer friend, who highly recommends this lawyer and she said that she would work on the case with him.unsure if I want her to know every detail of my life including financials.In a civil case which lawyer would you choose?
    I would choose the one with the most knowledge and experience for the type of case you would have. A lawyer may do very well for your mom's friend in one type of case, but not in your type of case. You should also check to see if any of the attorneys have a Martindale-Hubbell Rating. ';AV'; is the best rating. I understand your privacy concerns with respect to the third lawyer. I would also ask what their fees are, hourly or contingent, and what percentage if contingent fees are involved.





    Good luck,


    Dana (attorney)In a civil case which lawyer would you choose?
    civil suit covers many areas need more facts
    It doesnot really matter if you make the wrong choices in life here in choosing a civil lawyer, but since you are guided accordingly with some of the family members %26amp; some friends I do not think you will make the wrong turn or move in choosing one.





    In my own opinion it might better to talk with all of them, and make your own assessment, just like a doctor's prescription it might better to ask a second opinion on everything don't you think. Well in these case you got three choices, all you need is to choose one which you think is good %26amp; great for your case. If possible why not record every conversation with them buy one tape recorder %26amp; hid them between your coat or somewhere in the room. And after the conversation with each one of them, consult a psychologist well if you happen to have one good friend, and just inquire if who among these guys are telling me the truth. If this is too much for you then choose the best recommend one.
    I would pick number 3, I am a paralegal and have worked with attorneys for over 15 years.





    Attorneys are paid to work for your best interests, and with #3 you can be double sure this is being done, plus that attorney will not want to disappoint her colleague (friend) as most attorneys survive on referrals Plus the added bonus of your friend making sure this lawyer is doing her job and that she has the legal skills to understand if she is or isn't sways this choice for me.





    If not then go with Bar association recommendation, just because an attorney did good work for a family member doesn't mean your case is comparable. Go with professional referrals I think that would be your best bet.
    Bar associations give referrals NOT recommendations. Do not confuse the two. It is always best to go with an attorney that has a good reference. Consult with the two recommended attorneys and during your consultation do not be afraid to ask how much does it look like my damages are worth so that you can make a decision based on how much you will receive after fees. A good attorney is supposed to be able to tell you that. Do not sign with either attorney right away, give it a few days and let each attorney know that you have other consultations scheduled before making a hiring decision.

    How long it takes if you file a civil case int he Philippines regarding the bouncing check .?

    She issued me a check worth 250,000php when it was due she just pay me 30,000.00php. when i deposited the check it was closed account. How long it will takes if I file a case against her? My only evidence is the checks she issued me, I don't have any collaterals from her. Any referrals for the Attorney for me? TnxHow long it takes if you file a civil case int he Philippines regarding the bouncing check .?
    I would go see a lawyer asap

    Does the 6th amendment protect someone in a civil case where the ';witnesses'; want to remain anonymous?

    Custody is at stake, the ex has two ';anonymous'; witnesses that say I mistreated my kids, the child service investigator put them in a report.


    I've got lots of witnesses over years to say I haven't. Aren't I allowed to cross examine at trial??Does the 6th amendment protect someone in a civil case where the ';witnesses'; want to remain anonymous?
    Yes, you are allowed to cross examine them unless the judge makes the (very unlikely) decision to protect their identity (are they children?) Either way, however, he would still have to make them available, somehow, for cross examination of some sort. Don't worry, just get good legal counsel, and do your research. FYI--you will know who the witnesses are before court, bc they will be on a list provided during discovery, and your attorney can depose them to prepare your case.





    Relax. The truth will come out.Does the 6th amendment protect someone in a civil case where the ';witnesses'; want to remain anonymous?
    You know, your attorney might be best qualified to answer that.





    But you aren't being charged with a crime, right? You are in Family Court trying to establish custody. Who knows what the rules of evidence are? You need an attorney.





    Also, if the witnesses who are anonymous saw something specific that was abusive, all those other witnesses who didn't are irrelevent. Ted Bundy probably had one or two people with nothing bad to say about him.





    I think you're missing a lot of legal points here, and you'd better get an attorney.
    If you are not allowed then you attorney sucks and you need to hire another attorney.

    H E L P PLEASE!!, can anyone Explain the Roles of Juries in both Criminal and Civil cases?

    due today, i have to redo it for tomorow it is now 00:34, help and ten points + my eternal love and gratitude are yoursH E L P PLEASE!!, can anyone Explain the Roles of Juries in both Criminal and Civil cases?
    well THAT will teach you two things.


    1, The pressure that lawyers opperate under


    2. not to waste time on Q%26amp;A !!





    now get on wi it lass

    News stories of civil law cases?

    Can someone please give me some news stories of some civil law cases like someone suing someone? Thanks so much if you can help.News stories of civil law cases?
    Tommy Sheridan v New International (publishers of News of the world)





    This was a defamation case which has resulted in Tommy Sheridan being charged with the criminal offence of Perjury (lying in court)
  • beauty secrets
  • What is the statue of limitation to sue a doctor (civil case)?

    i had a consensual sexual relationship with my doctor and its been over 18 months since i last was seen by him can i go back and sue him in civil court? OhioWhat is the statue of limitation to sue a doctor (civil case)?
    I am a NC attorney. In NC, the statute of limitations is 3 years, but can be extended.





    I'm not sure why a consensual relationship would give rise to a lawsuit unless you were a minor, in which case you were not old enough to consent legally and therefore, it was not a consensual relationship.





    In NC, it's unethical for an attorney to have sexual relations with a client. I'm not sure about doctors in Ohio. And, unethical behavior does not necessarily give rise to a law suit. It might be before the State Medical Board instead.





    Call an attorney who handles these types of cases and ask for a consultation. Look for an attorney who is board certified or has many years of experience trying cases in court.





    Best wishes.What is the statue of limitation to sue a doctor (civil case)?
    that's not cool

    What is the statue of limitation to sue a doctor (civil case)?

    i had a consensual sexual relationship with my doctor and its been over 18 months since i last was seen by him can i go back and sue him in civil court? OhioWhat is the statue of limitation to sue a doctor (civil case)?
    I am a NC attorney. In NC, the statute of limitations is 3 years, but can be extended.





    I'm not sure why a consensual relationship would give rise to a lawsuit unless you were a minor, in which case you were not old enough to consent legally and therefore, it was not a consensual relationship.





    In NC, it's unethical for an attorney to have sexual relations with a client. I'm not sure about doctors in Ohio. And, unethical behavior does not necessarily give rise to a law suit. It might be before the State Medical Board instead.





    Call an attorney who handles these types of cases and ask for a consultation. Look for an attorney who is board certified or has many years of experience trying cases in court.





    Best wishes.What is the statue of limitation to sue a doctor (civil case)?
    that's not cool

    What is the difference between civil, criminal and public cases?

    that is the main question. but go to this web site


    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/鈥?/a>


    and briefly read this articel


    and can you plz.. plz.. plz... plz.. tell me if it is a civil, criminal or public case???What is the difference between civil, criminal and public cases?
    Civil law, as opposed to criminal law, refers to that branch of law dealing with disputes between individuals and/or organizations, in which compensation may be awarded to the victim. For instance, if a car crash victim claims damages against the driver for loss or injury sustained in an accident, this will be a civil law case.





    In the common law, civil law refers to the area of laws that affect the legal status of individuals. Civil law, in this sense, is usually referred to in comparison to criminal law, which is that body of law involving the state against individuals (including incorporated organizations) where the state relies on the power given it by statutory law. Civil law may also be compared to military law, administrative law and constitutional law (the laws governing the political and law making process), and international law. Where there are legal options for causes of action by individuals within any of these areas of law, it is thereby civil law.





    Civil law courts provide a forum for deciding disputes involving torts (such as accidents, negligence, and libel), contract disputes, the probate of wills, trusts, property disputes, administrative law, commercial law, and any other private matters that involve private parties and organizations including government departments. An action by an individual (or legal equivalent) against the attorney general is a civil matter, but when the state, being represented by the prosecutor for the attorney general, or some other agent for the state, takes action against an individual (or legal equivalent including a government department), this is public law, not civil law.





    (more........)





    http://www.answers.com/topic/civil-law-c鈥?/a>





    criminal law





    Law that deals with crimes and their punishments.





    Body of law that defines criminal offenses, regulates the apprehension, charging, and trial of suspected offenders, and fixes punishment for convicted persons. Substantive criminal law defines particular crimes, and procedural law establishes rules for the prosecution of crime. In the U.S., substantive criminal law originated for the most part in common law, which was later codified in federal and state statutes. Modern criminal law has been affected considerably by the social sciences, especially in the areas of sentencing, legal research, legislation, and rehabilitation.





    Columbia Encyclopedia: criminal law





    the branch of law that defines crimes, treats of their nature, and provides for their punishment. A tort is a civil wrong committed against an individual; a crime, on the other hand, is regarded as an offense committed against the public, even though only one individual may have been wronged. The real distinction lies in the way a remedy for the wrong is pursued. A tort is a wrong for which the remedy is pursued by, and at the discretion of, the injured individual or his or her representative, while a crime is a wrong for which the wrongdoer is prosecuted by the state for the purpose of punishment.





    (more........)





    http://www.answers.com/topic/criminal-la鈥?/a>





    public law





    The branch of law that deals with the state or government and its relationships with individuals or other governments.


    A law affecting the public.





    Law Encyclopedia: Public Law





    A general classification of law concerned with the political and sovereign capacity of a state.





    Public law is that area of constitutional, administrative, criminal, and international law that focuses on the organization of the government, the relations between the state and its citizens, the responsibilities of government officials, and the relations between sister states. It is concerned with political matters, including the powers, rights, capacities, and duties of various levels of government and government officials.





    Public law refers to an act that applies to the public at large, as opposed to a private law that concerns private individual rights, duties, and liabilities.





    Public law is a theory of law governing the relationship between individuals (citizens, companies) and the state. Under this theory, Constitutional law, administrative law and criminal law are sub-divisions of public law. This theory is at odds with the concept of Constitutional law, which requires all law to be specifically enabled, and thereby sub-divisions, of a Constitution.





    Generally speaking, private law is the area of law in a society that affects the relationships between individuals or groups without the intervention of the state or government. In many cases the public/private law distinction is confounded by laws that regulate private relations while having been passed by legislative enactment.





    (more.......)





    http://www.answers.com/topic/public-law

    Can someone else show up for me in my civil case?

    I'm doing a limited civil case for a simple name change, but I am out of state a lot. Can someone go for me with a power of attorney or something?Can someone else show up for me in my civil case?
    Possible but probably not because they can't ask someone else questions that only you can answer. You will just have to work your schedule into the court date somehow so you can be there if needed.Can someone else show up for me in my civil case?
    You know something, for a name change, I think you have to be present. But the one person that would know this for sure would be an attorney. You should call and ask one!
    In theory, yes.





    IN the case of name changes, it is not unusual for the presiding judge to question the petitioner about the history of the name or the reason for the petition. If you are not there, depending on the mood of the judge, you could find your petition deferred or even denied.





    I'd try to make it in person.
    For a name change, you probably won't have to appear at all. But you can always get a lawyer to represent you in that case.
    Sure.

    What is the statue of limitations to file a civil case.?

    I had a felony case that was dismissed without prejudice 7 years ago...can a civil case be filed after this much time?What is the statue of limitations to file a civil case.?
    Most civil cases have a or 2 year statute but some states have 5 not knowing the state yu are in makes a difference.~

    Are credit card theft (physically taken from purse) victims eligible to receive damages in a civil case?

    The criminal was apprehended after charging roughly $500.00. This is the criminal's fourth offense. The criminal trial begins shortly. If the criminal is found guilty, can we pursue a civil case for any type of damages?Are credit card theft (physically taken from purse) victims eligible to receive damages in a civil case?
    If you had an actual loss, yes. Usually credit card companies will protect you from fraudulent charges--if that is the case, it may be that the only person with a loss is the credit card company.





    Also, if he is found guilty, the court might order restitution. You won't get a double recovery.
  • beauty secrets
  • What is a court in FL finds you for default on a slander/libel civil case and you live in GA?

    I don't work nor own a house or anything. The guy is sueing for $50,000! Just what can this guy get? He is an idiot. and Karma is a *****. All I did was say he screwed someone over (in an email to someone who in turn forwarded the email to this guy) and he took that an ran with it. Please help if you know.What is a court in FL finds you for default on a slander/libel civil case and you live in GA?
    i have begun to answer your question several times, but there is no way to effectively answer within confines of this forum. so i will ask only one question at this point: have you been served with a copy of the lawsuit the guy filed? if so, i would think the correct response would be to have a lawyer file a ';special appearance'; in the Florida court challenging the court's personal jurisdiction to make a ruling against you. i suggest you do not attempt to do this on your own. there are too many ways you could take an action that would, under the law, ';waive jurisdiction'; thus giving the Florida court the authority to rule it may not otherwise possess. a court must have personal and subject matter jurisdiction to make a binding ruling in a case. note that a court may issue a ruling thinking it has authority based on representations made to it by the person bringing the suit. i have rarely seen a judge, in the busy judicial system that most are in, do any investigation beyond the bare-bones testimony of the petitioner. while it may be possible to set aside the judgment if the court lacked proper jurisdiction, this can be costly and time consuming. in the meantime, the defective judgment (whose defect would not necessarily be apparent on its face) could be used in efforts to collect the judgment against you. for instance, the Florida judgment could be registered in Georgia and enforced to the full extent of a judgment issued in Georgia. it is an unfortunate fact that even an idiot can use the judicial system to cost another time, aggravation, and money. there is a remedy for filing frivolous lawsuits, but then you still have to use.... i think you should consult a lawyer you trust and believe to have a good knowledge of jurisdictional issues. there are simply too many possibilities in this scenario to effect a viable legal strategy in this manner. sorry i cannot provide you comfort.What is a court in FL finds you for default on a slander/libel civil case and you live in GA?
    He's not going to get anything. He has to prove that what you said A) was not true, and B) harmed him in some way. Slander is very hard to prove. It would have had to have affected his business and personal life and would have to have been told by you, to many people. If you didn't show up, he might win by default, but I doubt it. If he wins by default, he can garnish your wages in the future to pay the debt. You will always have this hanging over your head. But again, he has to prove that he was irreversibly harmed.

    Maxine joan kroll, want court records of all civil case past and pending, all criminal cases past and pending?

    Good luck with that.Maxine joan kroll, want court records of all civil case past and pending, all criminal cases past and pending?
    Do you want Maxine to tell you or do you want the rest of us to solve your Maxine problem?





    For a start no one even knows what country you are in nor what specific locality. You need more detail there.Maxine joan kroll, want court records of all civil case past and pending, all criminal cases past and pending?
    Absolutely
    What is your question? Are you asking how to get the records?

    What are the statue of limitations of a civil case judgment?

    It will depend on the nature of the damages and the laws in your jurisdiction.What are the statue of limitations of a civil case judgment?
    A statute of limitations doesn't technically apply to a civil judgment. Rather, in most states, a civil judgment goes ';stale'; after a period of time.





    In some states, they can be renewed, and in some cases, are renewed automatically by actions to attempt to collect..i.e. debtor's examination, garnishment, etc.





    If a judgment has gone stale, it may or may not be collectable, depending on the code of civil procedure in your state. If you need more information, you would need to contact an attorney licensed in your state. For a referral, contact your local or state bar association.What are the statue of limitations of a civil case judgment?
    State specific; most are 20, some are 10,. most can be renewed
    Normally 7 years, Check local Laws.
    how much time do you have to appeal a civil judement case

    Do Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson serve a positive role in civil liberty cases....?

    ...or do they too often make simple ';police'; matters more complicated by playing the race card? I think they do both, and that in some instances, like this Jena6 case, they do more harm then good. What is your opinion as to the effects of their involvement in various cases?Do Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson serve a positive role in civil liberty cases....?
    THEY ARE BOTH PUBLICITY PIMPS. THEY RUN ABOUT SCREAMING RACIST THIS AND THAT AT THE DROP OF A HAT.WITH NO RHYME OR REASON , JUST TO EXCITE OR INCITE A REACTION TO ANY BELIEVED MISDEED REAL OR NOT.THEY THRIVE ON THE MISERY OF THEIR OWN PEOPLE WHILE THEY LIVE IN UPPER CLASS LIFE STILE.Do Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson serve a positive role in civil liberty cases....?
    No I believe they keep racism going myself that's just my opinion
    yep...you said it!
    I think they shade the underlying crime itself. If it's a crime of race in nature, then it should be dealt with as one. But just being supported by Jesse and Al does not mean it's racial. Only THEY make it that way.
    Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson have become synonomous with ';race card'; and they hurt the issues they would like most to help.





    Time to retire.
    you bet ye.
    You're making this question a 'racial' matter... you should delete it before Yahoo calls Jesse or Al.

    Thursday, May 13, 2010

    Can you file a civil case against a tavern in Pa?

    someone was in a tavern for 8 hours. Was never turned off. After leaving the bar wreaked and was charged with DUI with a .208 blood level. should not the bar be held on this as much as the drinker. I thought there where laws that they could shut you off after too much booze. and this person does not hold booze well. you could tell by the eyes alone when he';s corked.Can you file a civil case against a tavern in Pa?
    I suppose if the drunkard in question asked the tavern keeper to take responsibilty for the drunk's well-being, and the keeper agreed to do so. Otherwise, no. If PA has a ';dram shop'; law, the law exists for the protection of innocent parties injured by the drunk, not or the protection of the drunk. Therefore, if PA has a dram shop law it would give rise to a private cause of action only for the innocent victim and not for the drunkard.Can you file a civil case against a tavern in Pa?
    Did the person crash into you? If not, forget a lawsuit.





    The person in question never had to drink the alcohol.
    Did the bartender pour the drinks down his throat? If not then it was his own fault and his own responsibility.

    Can someone put a subpoena on your email account? in a civil case?

    That's all, I'm just curious. If you are in a civil case, say, regarding unpaid loans, can they send an order to gmail/yahoo/facebook/whatever so they release all of your info, or that's only reserved for criminal court?Can someone put a subpoena on your email account? in a civil case?
    Yes. Subpoenas can be served in civil cases to collect evidence. However, the request must be reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. So they can't just order the release of ';all your info'; from everyone.Can someone put a subpoena on your email account? in a civil case?
    They could ask for one from a judge, but to tell the truth, I can't think of why a judge would grant one and why a plaintiff would go to the trouble of getting it regarding unpaid loans. For other stuff, particularly child porn or something of that nature, then most definitely.
  • beauty secrets
  • Civil Cases having to w/ Assault ... What civil law is being broken!?

    Hi,





    I'm doing a little work a U.S. Law %26amp; Politics class, and I'm having some trouble understanding a concept.





    Civil Complaints are heard in civil courts of law, where civil codes are used to pass judgment.





    Now, if you take someone to court (civil court, for the sake of suing them) for Assault %26amp; Battery, both of which are violations of the state's penal code, what laws do you cite in court?





    Can you use the state's penal code to prove the guilt of the individual? Also, are there laws that say a guilty person must pay for the damages (in civil law) or do judges simply make the decision?





    Thanks.Civil Cases having to w/ Assault ... What civil law is being broken!?
    Assault %26amp; Battery will have a criminal element for prosecution by the state and will have a civil version for civil suits under the states tort law, you can use to prove your case in civil a conviction of the same facts by criminal court





    Part of the civil case is damages





    Basic tort law: is duty, breach of that duty, causation then damages

    I am the Defendant in a civil case in the UK, where the only evidence against me?

    is 1 terrible unreadable copy of a document on which my signature was forged. I have recieved a letter from a qualified handwriting expert saying that the copy is too poor to allow inspection of the question signature, therefore it cannot be proved or disproved.


    Does this work for me or against me?I am the Defendant in a civil case in the UK, where the only evidence against me?
    It works for you.I am the Defendant in a civil case in the UK, where the only evidence against me?
    The problem with civil law, as opposed to criminal law, is that it runs on the ';balance of probabilities';. In other words, the judge will weigh up all the evidence and decide on ';balance'; how he feels about it. It doesn't need to be ';beyond reasonable doubt'; as with the criminal law.





    Obviously, sometimes it's totally obvious what the right answer is, but much of the time it isn't. The civil law isn't at all black and white, and anyone who tells you otherwise is telling you porkies!





    In your case, if the judge believes the signature is yours then you are probably knackered. If he doesn't, then he will probably find in your favour.
    If as you say, the only evidence against you cannot be proved then this will work for you. It's hard to advise you fully without anymore information, you say this is a civil dispute, is it contractual? Tortious? Is it nuisance? Negligence? If you have obtained proper legal advice and thats the only evidence, then enquire about applying to the court for an interim hearing for summary judgment where you would argue that there seems to be no real case to take to court. If you have not then taken legal advice it may be an idea to contact the citizens advice bureau or check if there are any bro bono units that could help or advise you for free. Good luck.
    Works for you - to prove a case even in civil cases the onus is to prove without doubt.





    With this paper - it seems unlikely that 'without doubt' can be proved.





    Whoever is taking this case out against you has to prove that it is your signature - and from what you say, this is not going to happen and they will not be able to prove it
    Perhaps there might be a witness that testifies that you actually signed that piece of paper?





    You are not telling us the whole story though, and no one would take criminal proceedings unless there was enough EVIDENCE to present - due to the risk of losing the case and the high legal costs involved.
    Re the document: others have given you the correct answer. that civil cases are decided on the balance of probabilities.





    Re the case in general I strongly suspect that there is a lot you have NOT told us. You know whether you are guilty or not dont you ?
    You have not explained the circumstances surrounding the case. I suspect the plaintiff won't just be showing a piece of paper to a judge. They will lead witness evidence (i.e. the plaintiff, if no one else).





    What's the FULL story?

    What is the advantage of a plaintiff demanding a jury trial in a civil case?

    If you don't have a jury the verdict is up to the judge, and the judge only. If you have a jury, you have a more diverse group of people deciding your fate. Some see it as more of an oppertuinity for a guilty or innocent verdict depending on the case.

    Records of civil court cases in 2004 hawaii how can I get a copy?

    There are thousands of cases yearly. To get one of them, contact the clerk of the court where the case was brought.





    Some cases may be sealed from the public due to privacy issues.

    How long does it take to get a withdrawl of a plea of guilty in a civil case?

    There is no such thing as a guilty plea in a civil case.How long does it take to get a withdrawl of a plea of guilty in a civil case?
    You don't enter a plea in a civil case. You only enter a plea in a criminal case. So did you mean criminal case? Or did you mean something other than ';plea of guilty';?

    If a defendant appeals his civil case, does the become the plaintiff, or is he still considered the defendant?

    More specifically, if a district court grants the plaintiffs request for summary judgment, and you appeal, do you now become the plaintiff when the court of appeals hears your case, or are you still the defendant?If a defendant appeals his civil case, does the become the plaintiff, or is he still considered the defendant?
    You would be the defendant-appellant. Your adversary would be the plaintiff-respondent.If a defendant appeals his civil case, does the become the plaintiff, or is he still considered the defendant?
    No, he remains the defendant, since appealing a decision isn't the same as the defendant suing the plaintiff (essentially a counter-suit).
  • beauty secrets
  • How long does it take to get a withdrawal of a plea of guilty in a civil case?

    There's no such thing as a plea of guilty in a civil case. ';Guilty'; or ';Innocent'; apply only in criminal cases.





    Richard

    Is a civil case dismissed the day of court?

    I got a warrant in debt from Capital One back in November, when I received it i paid it in full to avoid going to court. My court date is coming up and it still isn't dismissed. Will it get dismissed the day of the court date? Can they still get a judgment against me?





    I also sent a letter to the court and proof showing I paid in fullIs a civil case dismissed the day of court?
    I had the same thing happen to me with Capital One. I paid it off before the court date and didn't bother to show up. Several months later I received the notice of dismissal, so I guess their lawyer didn't show up either and it just took a while for the court to catch up on the paperwork. I wouldn't worry about it.





    Hi, Pogolaw. I know you from the reunion.Is a civil case dismissed the day of court?
    I suggest that you attend any court hearing that is set for you. You are the defendant, and if you do not show then you can't argue you have paid the debt. If the case is called, and the plaintiff, Capitol One, is ready and you are not there, they have every right by law to ask for a default judgment and they will get it.





    What i suggest is calling their attorney and asking their intention is to dismiss the case, and ask for something in writing that says he is going to dismiss the case.


    You could also draft a document in the style of the pleadings that asks for the case to be dismissed because payment was made and then attach the proof. Alterr really isnt all that helpful because a court cant act if they haven't been asked to act. Ask them, in a motion to dismiss, to dismiss the case.
    Pick up the phone and try to get through to talk to a real person. Sometimes there is a considerable delay in the paper work. If they tell you on the phone that your case has been dismissed, ask them to send you a notification by mail.





    Failing to get satisfaction by telephone, try to arrange to go to the courthouse BEFORE the court date. If you wait until the court date, you will probably have to wait your turn for your case to be called.





    Another option might be to talk directly to Capital One, and confirm that they have received the payment. Ask their help in confirming that the case has been dismissed.





    I've worked in a program in conjunction with small claims court. I've seen cases dismissed simply because the other party did not show up. I've also seen someone win in court because the other party did not appear to defend themselves. In some small courts (I can't speak for all) there is still the possibility that the other party can appeal the dismissal if they file an appeal within a stated period, in Kansas ten calendar days.





    It's worth the extra time to clear your name. I once had a phone call from a defendant who had ignored a court order to pay $400 dollars for four years, and it was keeping him from getting a mortgage. (This was before all the current mortage debacle.)
    If you've paid in full it should be dismissed I would think, Capital One would not want to pay an attorney to show up for court. Phone or go by the court and ask the clerk what the status is, they might not want to discuss it over the phone because of privacy concerns but the clerk can tell you if it's still on the docket and why.





    You might have to submit some type of paperwork that hasn't been sent in yet and she can tell you what if anything is missing.
    Usually the lawyer will go before the court and tell the judge that the debt has been satisfied, and the judge will dismiss the case. The lawyer for Capital One will have probably about 50 cases on their docket that day. Usually you don't have to show up if you've paid, but if you have the name and number of the lawyer, try to give them a call ahead of time and ask if you need to be there or not.

    In a civil case, if your lawyer forgets to submit your evidence before handing it over to the defense can you?

    file an appeal? the case was dismissed because the lawyer didn't submit our evidence and the judge had to dismiss our case because of it. Our baby died not long after leaving a doctors office from dehydration. Please help me figure this out.


    Thanks TammyIn a civil case, if your lawyer forgets to submit your evidence before handing it over to the defense can you?
    Submit the evidence to the court? So your attorney didn't seek to have the evidence admitted?





    You could file an appeal, but I doubt that is the case (forgetting to submit the evidence to the court). Usually, the court will ask at the end of the day to find out what evidence is supposed to be admitted.





    How your baby die from dehydration? Is it the doctor's responsibility to hydrate your child? I thought it was the parents' responsibility to do so.

    Which of these types of cases would be tried as a civil case ?

    A. kidnapping


    B.lawsuit


    C. shoplifting


    D. traffic violationWhich of these types of cases would be tried as a civil case ?
    ';B'; lawsuit is a civil case. In some states some traffic violations are considered ';Civil Infractions';, but are still heard in the same setting as a criminal case.Which of these types of cases would be tried as a civil case ?
    ALL of the above.


    A lawsuit nearly ALWAYS means a civil lawsuit. A kidnapping victim could sue the kidnappers for civil damages, particularly if they were injured. For shoplifting, the value of the stolen items supply a claim for civil damages. Most jurisdictions treat traffic violations a civil infraction.
    Kidnapping, shoplifting and traffic violations are all covered under a punishable statute. A lawsuit is a civil case. One can be sued in civil court for the other three while at the outset a lawsuit is always a civil not a criminal case.
    Traffic Violation.
    traffic violation
    B. Lawsuit

    Do we have more civil cases than criminal cases in this country? (United States)?

    Yes, or No?Do we have more civil cases than criminal cases in this country? (United States)?
    I honestly cannot answer that with a yes or no.





    But I know first hand that there are backlogs for both criminal and civil cases within the court system. You raised a dam good question and one difficult to answer nationally, but maybe locally it could be done.





    Interesting question have a star!Do we have more civil cases than criminal cases in this country? (United States)?
    see yourself!

    Report Abuse



    It sure seems that way. We have become a sue happy people. But then again, even the criminals are allowed to sue because their civil rights might have been violated.

    The Trade Court hears only civil cases?

    I need help with this question for homework..its a true or false question??The Trade Court hears only civil cases?
    The United States Court of International Trade is a specialty court established under Article III of the United States Constitution and the Customs Act of 1980. It was formerly known as the Customs Court or Customs House Court.





    The Court has its main branch in New York, but can hear cases in any United States District or even in foreign countries.





    Its jurisdiction is limited to issues concerning International Trade and Customs Law matters. The purpose of the Court is civil and commercial in nature.





    It also has limited jurisdiction to hear challenges to anti-dumping and countervailing duties with respect to NAFTA related trading by Canada and Mexico.





    The Court has 9 members divided almost evenly between the political parties.





    The authority to create this Court vests in Congress under Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution.





    The appeals court for rulings from this Court is the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit which sits in Washington, DC.





    The principal issues typically litigated in this Court concern matters largely of imports of goods and products, or issues surrounding inappropriate imports that violate some law, custom or regulation.





    Its rules are patterned after the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and most rules issues are reported in the Federal Rules Decision reporters.





    Therefore, it as a court will only hear civil cases by its very nature.
  • beauty secrets
  • Criminal and civil cases?

    Hi could you please give my 3 examples of cases that could be heard in a criminal case, and 3 examples of cases that can be heard in a civil case. Also could you give me some facts on juries and the english legal system. Thankyou for your help.Criminal and civil cases?
    Hi


    Criminal Courts which are Crown courts deal with murder, theft and kidnapping etc etc that sort of thing


    County Courts deal with small claims (when you are sueing someone) divorces and family matters and pocessions on buildings, bankruptcy etc etc that sort of thing.


    Try the website below for more information for more facts and advice.Criminal and civil cases?
    Yes the cases heard in County Courts are civil cases. They do not normally have a jury either. If you are intersted in sitting in Court to hear a case, you will need to get go to a Crown Court, but phone the Court before hand to ensure the public (ie you) can sit in and listen to it.


    Goodluck

    Report Abuse



    county courts deal with civil cases normally brought by companies or individuals, ie, debt recovery or tresspass. magistrates and crown courts deal with criminal matters normally brought by the police. you can be tried for murder in the crown court in a case brought by the cps and be found innocent and then still end up in a civil action brought by the claimant themselves.
    English law falls into two categories:





    Criminal Law 鈥?offences relating to persons or property and affecting the whole community. A criminal case is called a prosecution


    Civil Law 鈥?wrongs relating to conflicts between individuals within the community. A civil case is called an action or a claim. Most laws are civil laws


    The rules governing Civil and Criminal law have evolved from three sources:


    Legislation - which includes statutes/Acts of Parliament


    Case (or Common) Law - made by judges. It has evolved over centuries from the judgment of cases appearing before the courts. These judgments set precedents against which future cases are judged


    European Community Law (which is binding in all UK Legal systems)





    Conflicts which sometimes arise between Common Law and Legislation are dealt with by the courts (legislation takes priority). Where EC law conflicts with national law, the UK courts are required to apply the EC law or to interpret national law to fit in with EC law.





    All criminal cases begin at the magistrates court and more serious criminal matters can be committed to the Crown Court to be heard before a judge and jury. Examples of criminal cases: assault (the more serious acts of assault, such as unlawful wounding and assault occasioning grievous bodily harm have to be heard at the Crown Court); theft (which ranges from theft by finding, i.e. picking up something you find in the street to sophisticated fraud); forgery.





    Civil matters of a less serious nature are heard before the County Court and more serious matters - and appeals -- are heard before the High Court. Examples of civil cases: landlord and tenant matters; defamation and statutory nuisance.
    civil court is for restittion in matters between individuals criminal court is reserved for cases where a criminal act is being charged. For instance in the state of Illinois a civil case can be brought against an individual who causes damage to anothers vehicle even if the insurance company has refused to pay if the traffic ticket written at the time is thrown out of court.
    A criminal case has to be proved by counsel to be 'beyond reasonable doubt'





    A civil case has a weaker proof threshold, its on 'the balance of probabilities'.





    Example: The trial of the US sportsman OJ Simpson, who was accused of murdering his wife. He was found not guilty in a criminal court because the prosecution failed to convince the jury of his guilt beyond reasonable doubt. But the family of the woman, brought a civil case against OJ and won, because counsel demonstrated OJ's probable guilt judged by the criteira of 'on the balance of probabilities'.





    Although the example is from the US I think the same principles apply. Also in a criminal case the verdict is decided by a jury, in a civil case the judge decides.

    By law, do I HAVE to testify if subpoened in a CIVIL case?

    Quick details, the company I work for is threatening a lawsuit against a client that I worked on and with who I have a great rapport and possible future career opportunities. The bad thing is that I think my company is in the wrong and would be setting myself up here. I am REALLY uncomfotable with having to testify and I am pretty darn sure I will be called. If I do, do I have to testify? Thanks!By law, do I HAVE to testify if subpoened in a CIVIL case?
    You have to show up, that is what a subpoena is for. If you don't you risk ';contempt of court'; charges which could put you in jail. The risk is if you tell the ';whole'; truth you could probably get fired so be sure you are ready for the change of jobs. If you feel your company is in the wrong, tell them. Again, you will probably loose the job. The alternative is to tell the client you feel the company is in the wrong. Then they could ask you questions to show the company is wrong. Even then the new company would probably not hire you to avoid looking like they paid you for your testimony. Looks bad for you no matter how you slice it up. Good luck.By law, do I HAVE to testify if subpoened in a CIVIL case?
    The sanctions for refusal to obey a properly issued (and served) subpoena, except on proper grounds, can vary by state. The word ';subpoena'; is latin for ';under penalty';. Unless you are asked a question, the answer to which you believe might subject you to potential criminal responsibility, then you will have no choice but to answer truthfully or face the possibility of confinement (or other sanction) for civil contempt. These facts and duties are well-known to the client that you used to work with and their lawyer(s). There's little they can do, in a practical sense, to stop a subpoena from being issued if your company has proper legal grounds to request the issuance of the subpoena. You may also be deposed prior to an actual trial taking place. Keep in mind that most civil actions are settled out of court so you may escape the service of a subpoena. Even if served and/or deposed, it may still be settled before an actual trial takes place, or even at some time during the trial.
    No -- you can refuse to obey the subpoena (which is a court order) and face charges of contempt of court.





    You are never required to obey any law, or to abide any court order -- you just face the penalties for failing to do so.
    If there is a subpeona, you absolutely have to testify or be found in contempt.
    You can refuse and of course you may be held in contempt of the court but you can submit a statement saying why (citing your reasons why, if you give a good enough argument and have a decent judge they'll let you off). You could also testify and it sounds as if what you are saying that your testimony may work in your favor.
    If you don't go to court when served with a subpoena, you can be charged with contempt of court. You can also lose your job.





    If you do go to court and testify about what you remember, you don't get in trouble with your boss or the court. Of course it is difficult to remember a lot of details. If you really can't recall the details, just say so on the stand and get it over with.

    Can settlement talks be used as evidence in civil cases?

    no. the only evidence that can be used is documents, sworn testimony, or affidavits. otherwise, they don't have to admit to having said it and anything else is just heresay.Can settlement talks be used as evidence in civil cases?
    only if both sides admitt there was an agreement.Can settlement talks be used as evidence in civil cases?
    I don't believe they can, generally. There may be circumstances under which aspects of the talks needs to be introduced, but I still think (generally), no.





    NOTE: I am not a lawyer.
    yes
    IT DEPENDS.





    IF you go to a mediation hearing where you have an agreement between both parties that the information presented in that meeting is confidential... then you can't use it in court.





    However, if you have simply had talks with the other party on your own with no pre-arranged rules, whatever you have said is fair game. However, proving the contents of such a conversation would be difficult.