Friday, May 14, 2010

Do Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson serve a positive role in civil liberty cases....?

...or do they too often make simple ';police'; matters more complicated by playing the race card? I think they do both, and that in some instances, like this Jena6 case, they do more harm then good. What is your opinion as to the effects of their involvement in various cases?Do Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson serve a positive role in civil liberty cases....?
THEY ARE BOTH PUBLICITY PIMPS. THEY RUN ABOUT SCREAMING RACIST THIS AND THAT AT THE DROP OF A HAT.WITH NO RHYME OR REASON , JUST TO EXCITE OR INCITE A REACTION TO ANY BELIEVED MISDEED REAL OR NOT.THEY THRIVE ON THE MISERY OF THEIR OWN PEOPLE WHILE THEY LIVE IN UPPER CLASS LIFE STILE.Do Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson serve a positive role in civil liberty cases....?
No I believe they keep racism going myself that's just my opinion
yep...you said it!
I think they shade the underlying crime itself. If it's a crime of race in nature, then it should be dealt with as one. But just being supported by Jesse and Al does not mean it's racial. Only THEY make it that way.
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson have become synonomous with ';race card'; and they hurt the issues they would like most to help.





Time to retire.
you bet ye.
You're making this question a 'racial' matter... you should delete it before Yahoo calls Jesse or Al.

No comments:

Post a Comment